What was the best part about using McGraw-Hill Connect?
Honestly, I have yet to find anything positive about MHC as a student. Although I am not a professor, I can definitely see how the set up can make teaching in the classroom far more efficient.
What would you change about your experience with McGraw-Hill Connect?
Change the chapter reading. There's something about the chapter reading, highlights, and refreshers, that I simply feel "disconnected" with. The biggest frustration is reading the highlights, getting prompted to review, then getting questions that are in the text, but are 20 pages ahead of where I stopped. I also feel like the question is not "adaptive", but simply lazy. Get rid of so many questions asking to, check all that apply. I could find ways that all the answers are correct, but it doesn't mean they are.
Overall Feedback
Although my title may seem naive, it was the best way I could describe my views. I do not consider this software a waste of time because it frustrates me; I consider it a waste of time because I end up spending 3x longer attempting to accomplish a task then I should need to. I have to allocate hours worth of time in order to simply make sure I get a score that says "complete" in my professors grade book. This costs me valuable time that I could be reading the way I learn best, taking notes on things I don't understand, and moving forward to come back to it later. This in turn allows me to spend less time while accomplishing more. Instead, the MHC system does not allow me to move on and forces me to answer more questions in order to get credit for one. Overall, this causes a task that should take 45-60 minutes, to take 3+ hours. I can say with confidence, that I will stop taking classes that use the MHC system.