OnBase

I think that the best part about using this software is when it comes its accessibility. You can access your data in a multi-device where you can use check your documents and files wherever you go. Moreover you can integrate the interface easily with the features and the options that it has.

I think that the worst part about this software is when it comes to its licensing which is a bit pricey. Sometimes, it is not capable of interconnecting to some of the in house applications. I also heard that some are also having a problem with the integration of sharepoint but I have not encountered it yet.

With the overall feedback of this software, I can say that this is the software which you need to explore first. Because of its expensive licensing, it will be better if you could test it out yourself rather than implementing it first. You can also read feedback to those who have already use the software.

OnBase by Hyland Software Solution has a considerable community using it and it is an enterprise CMS allowing a lot of features and remarkable functionalities. OnBase is capable of managing content, processes, cases and more. OnBase allows a document-imaging feature that can be used to capture content and arrange documents. OnBase is a true Enterprise grade software that delivers powerful security measures.

Users complain about the steep learning curve that OneBase has in order to master all of the software potentialities. There is no online FAQ for common questions and it seems that the knowledge base is not accessible. Otherwise, there are not much to dislike on OnBase software solution and there are not many complaints or negative feedback from customers that worth mentioning here.

There is comparable software solution like M-Files and SmartSearch. There are some glitches with OnBase since some users can't search for a document quite easily. OnBase can be integrated easily with Microsoft Outlook, ERP platforms and more. OnBase has a native mobile application fro Android, IOS devices and Windows Phone.

I think that the best part about using OnBase is that its workflows are very easy to configure, import and use. Fast and accurate It includes Outlook integration and it is definitely the easy one client. OnBase offers functions with e-mail systems, real time updates, remote document access, document tagging and OCR functions. It has multi-language versions. You can store documents in two locations for different purposes. That's what I call a recommendable tool.

Its starting price is very expensive. It has so very professional features but it is very hard to afford that amount. If you are starting a new project, you have to set very well your budget.

An user-friendly program that can be synced with other programs. A helpful customer support is redy to give you a hand 24/7, and this is a big plus for OnBase. The workflow engine is quite flexible and powerful, easy to configure. So, if you have a considerable budget, I highly recommend this option.

Hyland Onbase is a behemoth of an item with more than 120 modules that lets a business basically oversee and empower pretty much any archive one could consider. With Onbase, data can be rapidly and effortlessly made open to pretty much any element through numerous mediums (a thick, thin, web, half breed, web administration, and an API that accompanies 2 weeks of preparing to try and utilize). Far and away superior yet, it's work process framework has more than 150 distinct activities that can be fixing to an archive's life-cycle which takes into account pretty much any conceivable situation in a business should be figured it out. It is anything but difficult to keep up in a standard establishment and shockingly better yet it's sufficiently shabby to be reasonable yet sufficiently costly to mirror the measure of strength the stage brings.

There are a few things that, as a software engineer, can be to some degree baffling. In the programming scene, we are taught to 'conceive brand new ideas' and think of notable arrangements and effective approaches to consistently take care of issues. One thing I despise about design inside OnBase is the constraints. What might be a basic extent check in JavaScript or an If/else in any Object-Oriented dialect turns into a genuine test of inventiveness. You are now and again compelled to take the amazingly panoramic detour with a specific end goal to accomplish basic yield. Along these lines of going about arrangement improvement is amazingly helpful, in any case, when you have somebody coming into the photo that has no former programming knowledge.

In executing this item it is vital to know the extent of the arrangement you look for. By showing what your finished objective is OnBase can accurately demo their item to address your issues. Without bearing, the framework might appear to be overpowering and outside of your needs. In any case, once the item is executed you can pick up control and buy just the bundles you require as opposed to the whole programming item.